Cited by 661Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DETERMINING REFERENCE CONDITIONS FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS

Abstract

The fire disturbance regime and forest structure prior to Euro-American settlement (AD 1883) of a southwestern ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) landscape were quantified in order to establish reference conditions as a baseline for ecosystem management. The mean presettlement fire interval between 1637 and 1883 was 3.7 yr for all fires and 6.5 yr for widespread fires, but fire has been excluded from the study area since 1883. Forest density increased under fire exclusion from an average of 148 trees/ha in 1883 (65 pines, 80 oaks, three other species), an open forest dominated by relatively large ponderosa pines, to 1265 trees/ha in 1994/1995 (720 pines, 471 oaks, 74 others), a dense forest characterized by relatively small and young trees. Species composition has shifted toward greater dominance by Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii) and conifers less adapted to frequent fires: white fir (Abies concolor) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). The reference presettlement conditions can be applied to management of this ecosystem in two ways. First, reference conditions are a benchmark against which to evaluate contemporary conditions and future alternatives. The comparison shows that the contemporary forest is well above the range of presettlement variability in forest density, and both live and dead fuel structures have developed that can support high-intensity wildfire. Second, reference conditions can serve as a goal for ecological restoration treatments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0895:drcfem]2.0.co;2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. W. W. Covington, P. Z. Fule, M. M. Moore, S. C. Hart, T. E. Kolb, J. N. Mast, S. S. Sackett, and M. R. Wagner . In press. Restoration of ecosystem health in southwestern ponderosa pine forests .Journal of Forestry .
  2. J. R. Habeck, 1990 .Old-growth ponderosa pine-western larch forests in western Montana: ecology and management .Northwest Environmental Journal, 6 :271 -292 .
  3. T. E. Kolb, M. R. Wagner, and W. W. Covington .1994 .Concepts of forest health .Journal of Forestry, 92 :10 -15 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 661

Metadata

Authors
Fulé, P. Z., Covington, W. W., & Moore, M. M.
Affiliations
Northern Arizona University (US)
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-08
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
895-908
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144949114
Cited by
661
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 25
FWCI
15.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
reference conditions, ecosystem management, ponderosa pine forests, ponderosa pine, fire return interval, fire suppression, forest density, species composition change, Gambel oak, white fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii, forest fires, ecological restoration, southwestern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review